Align files across buyer and seller.

Before the deal can close, every file has to end up on the right side. That’s data separation, and it’s the hardest part.

Real-World Scale

A $2B divestiture of a digital advertising business from a media conglomerate. 5,000 employees. 395 million files. Every one of them had to be reviewed to determine what stayed with the seller and what transferred to the buyer.

Before Octosight existed, this required six separate tools. A 60-day timeline stretched to 12 months. The transaction close was delayed. The cost reached $8M.

This volume is not an edge case. It represents how unstructured data accumulates inside modern organizations.

Why data separation is required.

In divestitures, ownership changes faster than systems and data do. The TSA period provides a defined window to separate data. Each party retains the IP required to operate. Unrelated or sensitive data does not transfer. Data subject to legal hold must be preserved before any remediation begins.

In a divestiture, employees are formally mapped to either remain with the seller (Oldco) or transfer to the buyer (Newco). In practice, far more people than those assigned to the transaction hold data relevant to both sides. The data involved reflects years of collaboration that did not anticipate a future transaction.

Teams work across accounts, campaigns, and regions using everyday tools designed for productivity, not separation. Files move between laptops, shared drives, SharePoint, and OneDrive. Emails are forwarded, attachments are reused, and meeting artifacts accumulate over time. When separation begins, that data already exists everywhere it is allowed to exist.

The challenge is that data separation cannot be executed reliably with email instructions, manual searches, or progress tracked in spreadsheets. Those tools were never designed to identify, validate, and remediate data at this scale, under the time pressure and scrutiny of a transaction, with defensibility.

01

Ensure the buyer receives the IP required to operate the acquired business.

02

Prevent unrelated or sensitive seller IP from transferring.

03

Meet regulatory, contractual, and audit requirements under fixed timelines.

What separation actually costs
Keep everything
$0 direct cost
Indefinite risk. Data remains commingled. Regulatory obligations go unmet. The true cost shows up in headlines, lawsuits, and regulatory findings. Not a viable option.
Delete everything
$28M
8 months
Delete everything. Issue new laptops. IP permanently destroyed. Revenue lost while employees cannot work. Deal value materially reduced.
Manual cleanup
$2M+
10 months
20+ consultants send guidance by email. Employees run keyword searches. No centralized tracking. No audit trail. Impossible to defend at scale.
Custom solution
$8M
12 months
Multiple licenses + advisory team · 4 mo. build · 2 mo. config · 6 mo. execution
Cobble together tools from separate vendors. Each connection is a failure point. No single audit trail. Fragile and expensive to operate.
Octosight
$2M
4 months
Platform license + advisory team · 0 mo. build · 2 mo. config · 2 mo. execution
Ready on Day 1. Smaller advisory team. Faster execution. Lower total cost.

The outcome landscape.

Total CostHighLowDefensibilityLowHighEffectiveness = Bubble SizeKeepEverything$0 direct +unknown indirect costMaximum riskManualCleanup$2M+ | 10 monthsNo audit trailFullDelete$28M | 8 monthsIP destroyed,deal value erodedCustomSolution$8M | 12 monthsFragile, no consistencyOctosight$2M | 4 monthsIP preserved • full audit trail

Only one approach delivers effective, defensible separation without eroding value.

The Octosight approach.

Data separation fails when search, review, and execution live in different systems.

Octosight connects them.

Centrally defined criteria surface the right files. Employees review in guided workflows. Decisions carry straight through to execution, without moving data between tools.

Legal hold and retention can be preserved before remediation begins.

From first criteria to final audit, the work stays in one governed platform.

How it works.

PDFPDF1Filter to what matters2Review guidance and files in place3Make defensible decisionsOldcoNewcoKeepDelete5Execute those decisions4Integrated support and reporting?Support87%ReportingMANIFEST395M files • 100% verified6Prove what happened

Six steps. One platform.

1
Filter to what matters

Centrally defined criteria narrow millions of files down to the ones that require human review. Most data never needs to be touched.

4
Integrated support and reporting

Built-in ticketing, contextual guidance, and real-time dashboards give program managers and executives clear visibility into progress and exceptions.

2
Review guidance and files in place

Employees review their own files alongside clear, role-specific guidance. No data moves between systems. No email chains. No guesswork.

5
Execute those decisions

Tagged files route to the correct destination. Seller data stays. Buyer data transfers. Retained data is preserved. Deleted data is permanently removed.

3
Make defensible decisions

Every file gets a disposition: keep, transfer, preserve, or delete. Decisions are captured at the point of review with the reasoning attached.

6
Prove what happened

Immutable audit trail documents every decision, every action, and every outcome. Defensible under regulatory scrutiny or litigation.

The result.

Faster execution. Lower total cost.

Preserved deal value without sacrificing defensibility.

Minimal disruption to day-to-day operations.

Real-time visibility for program managers and executives.

Defensible record backed by immutable audit trail.

Close the deal.
Get your weekends back.

See how it works.

By submitting this form, you agree to Octosight processing your information per our Terms and Privacy Notice.